final audit

Can Playing cards already be considered a legendary hall?

This is the honest final score: where the direction is already standard-level, where it beats other systems, and which production nodes still separate it from 100%.

Meaning and method distinction

Almost standard-setting

98%

Ordinary deck fixed as an advantage, not a poor Tarot version.

Add visual method-comparison page after the next hall.

Techniques and spreads

Very strong level

96%

There are 52, 36, 32, short lines, money, message, choice, and tableau.

Add true visual 32/36 board in production.

Answer quality

Methodically ready

94%

Answer must show suit, rank, color, courts, pairs, timing, risk, and archive.

Connect strict OpenAI JSON schema and repair loop.

Live table

Strong blueprint

88%

Shuffle, client/oracle draw, and auto-transition after final card are already described.

Connect the component to real backend flow and visual assets.

Commercial design

Premium

95%

There is entry, middle, 36 flagship, 32 tableau, and Council of Halls.

Connect Stripe price IDs and real product pages.

Archive and retention

Conceptually complete

90%

Added suit of the week, rank of the period, court memory, and Echo.

Store these fields in Supabase and show them in Seeker account.

Production readiness

Needs assembly

78%

Contracts, pages, tests, and project checks are strengthened.

AI, payments, Supabase, visuals, mobile QA, and Vercel build remain.